Talk:Bottom–up and top–down design

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bottom–up and top–down design article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 6 months

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cognitive science (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science articles

Top-down and Bottom-up Approaches in Psychology

I have added a very brief description about top-down and bottom-up processing in the world of Psychology, and I have also referenced the information that I used.Please let me know if there are some inaccuracies that need to be fixed in the information I have added.Joysabal (talk) 03:55, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@Joysabal:The information about neurology is outdated. Researchers now think that all levels of cortical processing are subject to top-down processing. Note the discussion of recurrent feedback processing and the influence of higher-tier cortical areas on the V1 page.ParticipantObserver (talk) 19:26, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Overall a good article on top down and bottom up design — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hir47584 (talk • contribs) 20:29, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Ecology Section-adding information, fixing grammar

Hello! My name is Nicole Bednarik.

I felt that the Ecology section of this article did not elaborate enough on either of the processes. I have added more details going off of what the original text said, including a citation from where I got this information from. I also fixed some grammar issues that took away from the quality of the section.

If any of my information is incorrect, could be added to further, or if I am missing any citations, please let me know or change it.

Bednariknicole (talk) 16:23, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Bednariknicole[reply]

Pyramidal Modeling

This may prove useful ... https://stevegluck.com/pyramidal-modeling.html ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sequitorian (talk • contribs) 16:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Schooling

Fixed some blatant speling errors (sic) in the paragraph "Schooling" - then noticed it appears to be of poor quality. Someone with subject knowledge may want to review its contents. Vintagesound (talk) 17:59, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Top. Bottom. And. More. Role. In. PDF

Yes. Pdf 39.34.146.89 (talk) 11:24, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Human Cognition SP23

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2023 and 15 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Edwin2233 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Edwin2233 (talk) 18:12, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Missing sources

We still need "Schneider 2015" and "Koch 2022". They were added by an IP in 2022. DuncanHill (talk) 00:31, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]